Which one are you?
(Poster taken from http://flickr.com/photos/crobj/458930272/)
Tuesday and Wednesday this week, I attended an in-house training held at Crystal Crown, Kepong. Alhamdulillah, did not regret attending it since it was an interesting topic, fun and enjoyable sessions with great facilitator and tak pening kepala nak hadapi jem sebab buat di area outside KL. Also got to know new faces from IIUM.
It was called Situational Leadership. Bagaimana seorang pemimpin nak lead and deal with their followers/subordinates should be guided by the 4 types of leadership styles. Initially we were first reminded on the 2 extremes of being Autocratic and Democratic, where an autocratic leader practices non-participatory, always closely supervising his or her subordinates and will usually tell subordinates what, how, when, and where to do things. A democratic on the other hand is more participatory, accept inputs from subordinates, provide encouragement and support and loosely supervising his or her subordiantes.
So, where are you at? Do not get me wrong. Whether one seems to be democratic or autocratic does not necessarily mean that the other extreme i.e autocratic is bad. A leader must actually match the role correctly, depending on the situations or people. At times you can be a democratic, at other times, an autocratic.
So that we can comprehend and see things clearly and openly, we were always reminded to put ourselves as ‘the leader’, not as ‘the follower’. If not, we will always be looking at things like “ha….boss aku memang patut buat ni, dia tak patut buat tu..etc”. The objective is that WE need to get the knowledge to improve ourselves. So forget about your bosses or leaders, but focus on yourselves and how you can make it happen!
Then, Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership framework was introduced, emphasized, discussed and reviewed to the extend that each participant was able to present the framework in details to others. We were encouraged to share the knowledge to others especially to those that we lead so that we will always be doing things ‘consciously’. Selama ini kita ni banyak buat benda ’subconsciously’, thru the process of repetition.
Nak buat lebih faham, kami disuruh mengingati saat-saat first time kenal our ‘partner in life’ aka husband/wife lah. During that time, we were not actually being ourselves, since things that we did when with him/her were done consciously. We were not ourselves since we were trying to potray the best of ourselves.
Since people that we lead will always see if we ‘walk the talk’, then, by sharing all that we learnt to them, it will make ourselves more conscious on our leadership actions that they know we should be practicing on. This will eventually lead to ‘practice makes perfect’, where, when we correctly match the leadership styles according to situations and followers development level, then it will become a good habit to continue.
Tara…….!
Nampak macam senang ye…
So, Hersey and Blanchard have this 4 types of leadership styles, based on how low and high a leader directs (the x axis), and how low and high a leader support (y axis). With this we will have a four quadrant diagram (leceh sikit nak melukisnya di sini):
- Directing (or called S1). This type of leader gives direction more than support. This is good to apply to followers who are called D1. D1 has good commitment but low in terms of competency. For example, new staff to the organization, or staff starting working at a new place. A leader should ensure this staff knows what to do in terms of job skill. He or she is very excited to work.
- Coaching (or called S2). This gives high in both support and direction, but will usually let the staff do things themselves, with appropriate guide. Applies to followers who are called D2, who have some competencies in the job skill but have low commitment. Excitement is job is less, which may be contributed by many factors, i.e lack of confidence to do the work, etc.
- Supporting (or called S3), where this has low in directing but high in support. A leader need to do this to those followers of D3 who are actually very high in job competency but has low in commitment. Our facilitator gave an example of the ‘OTAI’, very knowledgeable in the job. Reason like no promotion for a long time has turn this staff into a D3. So, a leader need to give more support to this kind of followers. ‘Tepuk belakang’, nasihat, be in ‘their shoes’.
- Delegating (or called S4), not ‘dumping’ ye. This is low in both support and direction. Applies to followers who are very competent and have high commitments (D4). Kalau ada ramai macam this type of followers, senang banyaklah tugas seorang leader. Leader boleh fokus pada things yang lebih strategik, bukan pada managing the details, which is the tasks of a manager.
We did some games and tests. Sempat jugak exercise ikut lagu ‘The Chicken Dance’ (yang ada anak kecil maybe familiar with this exercise) bila participants nampak macam nak jadi resmi padi, makin berisi makin tunduk. Test like the Wilderness Survival taught us the meaning of group synergy. Then the Leadership Behaviour Analysis-Self test taught us to classify the different types of leadership styles(S1-S4) and matching them with the correct D1-D4 of the Followers Development Level. Memang sah! kami semua banyak yang punya tendency for being a S3- Supporting, walaupun ada jugak yang boleh dikira dengan jari yang D1 or directing (sah ramai lelaki yang begini).Ramai yang mengeluh sebab banyak betul yang kami ada mismatch of the leadership style.
Do not forget that, the styles do not only depends on the development level of the staff. At different times, a leader may apply a different style to the same staff. We must look at the situation too. At times, the staff is competent and committed to do something, at times, they will have problems , related to work, attitude, etc.
I know that all my friends in the 2 days training enjoyed themselves. Most importantly, we will remember what we learnt and hopefully IIUM is not putting the money into the drain.
Semua orang BOLEH!

